Guide

Understanding Your California Severance Agreement: A Clause-by-Clause Guide

What common California severance agreement clauses mean: releases, Section 1542, age waivers, arbitration, confidentiality, noncompetes, no-rehire, repayment, and more.

By Shelley Bryant — California Employment Attorney · Practicing California law since 2002Published Law reviewed through

In short Most severance agreements are built from the same clauses. Each section below explains what a clause does, why employers include it, what it can mean for you, the legal limits that apply, and what deserves a closer look. Whether a particular clause is enforceable often depends on its exact wording and your circumstances, so treat this as a map, not a verdict.

New to severance agreements? Start with California Severance Agreements: What Employees Should Know Before Signing. Deciding what to do? See Should You Accept, Negotiate, or Reject a California Severance Agreement?

On this page

The release

General release of claims

What it means. You give up legal claims against the employer, and usually its related companies, managers, and employees, that exist when you sign. Releases usually list many statutes by name and then add "any and all claims" language.

Why employers include it. The release is the main thing the severance pays for: certainty that the employer won't face claims about your employment.

What it can mean for you. A release given for consideration bars the claims it covers unless it was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation, duress, or undue influence. Broad "employment laws" language has been held to reach FEHA discrimination and harassment claims, even when the employee didn't intend to give them up. [S1]

Legal limits. Covered below under what can't be released.

Look closely at: who is released (individual managers, parent companies, staffing or PEO companies); whether it covers only past claims; and whether you are being paid for anything beyond what you're already owed.

Unknown claims: Civil Code section 1542

What it means. California law provides that a general release does not reach claims you don't know or suspect exist when you sign, if knowing about them would have materially affected your decision. Severance agreements usually include an express waiver of this protection, often quoting the statute. [S2]

Why employers include it. Without the waiver, claims you discover later can survive the release. [S2]

What it can mean for you. With an informed waiver, the release can reach claims you haven't identified yet. [S2] That is one reason it pays to think through your employment history before signing, not just the reasons given for your termination.

Legal limits. A section 1542 waiver does not make non-waivable rights waivable. [S2][S3]

What a release cannot take away

Even a broad release with a section 1542 waiver generally cannot reach:

RightWhat the law saysSource
Wages due and unpaidAn employer may not require a release of wages due unless they have been paid; a release obtained in violation is void.[S4]
Reimbursement of necessary work expenses (Lab. Code § 2802)Agreements waiving these rights are void to that extent.[S3]
Claims based on things that happen after you signReleases cover accrued claims based on past conduct, not future rights.[S5]
Filing charges with or reporting to government agenciesA severance agreement cannot bar reporting to or cooperating with agencies such as the EEOC, the Civil Rights Department, or the SEC.[S6][S25]
Representative PAGA claimsClaims brought on the state's behalf under the Private Attorneys General Act generally can't be waived in a private agreement. This area of law is changing.[S7]

A release that reaches too far isn't automatically void as a whole. California courts read broad releases as not covering non-waivable rights, and treat them as invalid only to that extent. [S3]

Look closely at: language promising you have "been paid all wages owed," reported all injuries, or know of no violations; and whether wage or expense claims you believe you have would actually be released.

Age-discrimination waivers (ADEA / OWBPA)

What it means. If you are 40 or older, a waiver of federal age-discrimination claims must meet minimum requirements: plain language, a specific reference to the ADEA, no waiver of future claims, something of value beyond what you're already owed, written advice to consult a lawyer, 21 days to consider (45 in a group program), and 7 days to revoke after signing. [S8]

Why employers include it. To make the release effective against federal age claims.

What it can mean for you.

  • In a group program, you're entitled to written information about who was selected and who wasn't, by job title and individual age, across the decisional unit. [S8] That information can matter in deciding whether to sign.
  • If the waiver doesn't comply, it can't bar a federal age claim, and you don't have to return the money first. [S9]
  • The agreement cannot penalize you for challenging the age waiver, for example by requiring you to pay the employer's fees for doing so. [S9]

Look closely at: whether the group disclosures were provided and are complete; whether the deadlines are at least the minimum; whether the revocation period is stated; and whether the employer changed the offer (a material change restarts the consideration period). [S8]

Arbitration

Arbitration language can show up in more than one document: an agreement you signed during employment, and the severance agreement itself. Read them together. How they interact depends on the exact words, when each was signed, which law governs, and the circumstances.

An arbitration agreement you signed during employment

What it means. An agreement, often signed at hiring and often electronically, to resolve claims in private arbitration instead of court.

What it can mean for you. If valid, it may require your claims to be decided in individual arbitration. Its enforceability turns on several questions:

  • Formation. Was an agreement actually formed? An electronic signature has legal effect, but the employer must be able to show it was your act; a conclusory declaration has been held insufficient. [S11]
  • Fairness. For mandatory arbitration of non-waivable statutory claims such as FEHA claims, California requires a neutral arbitrator, more than minimal discovery, a written award, all relief that would be available in court, and no requirement that the employee pay unreasonable costs or arbitrator fees. Terms that are both procedurally and substantively unfair can be unenforceable. [S12]
  • Statutory exceptions. See statutory exceptions below. [S13]
  • Waiver by the employer. An employer that litigates in court before seeking arbitration may lose the right to arbitrate. [S14]

A new arbitration provision in the severance agreement

What it means. A clause requiring future disputes (often including disputes about the severance agreement itself) to be arbitrated.

Why employers include it. To keep any later dispute out of court and to make arbitration rules uniform.

What it can mean for you. A new clause, supported by the severance payment, can create arbitration obligations that did not exist before, for example if you never signed an arbitration agreement. [S17] It doesn't fix an earlier agreement; it is a new agreement that must meet the same formation and fairness rules on its own. [S12] If the release covers all your claims, a forward-looking clause may matter less, but it still governs disputes about the severance agreement and anything that isn't released.

Legal limits. California's statute restricting mandatory arbitration as a condition of employment has been held preempted by federal arbitration law, and negotiated severance agreements fall outside that statute in any event. [S15] So there is no blanket prohibition on arbitration terms in severance agreements; fairness rules still apply. [S12]

Look closely at: whether the clause would cover claims that were never subject to arbitration before; whether it carves out sexual harassment and sexual assault claims; and its confidentiality, cost, and discovery terms.

Reaffirmation of an earlier agreement

What it means. Language such as "Employee reaffirms the Arbitration Agreement dated…"

What it can mean for you. Reaffirming an agreement that could otherwise be challenged generally works only if you knew what you were doing and acted with full knowledge of your rights. Silence or simply continuing to work is not enough. [S16] An express, informed reaffirmation in a severance agreement may succeed where the original agreement would have failed. That is why this language deserves attention before you sign.

Unsettled question. Whether reaffirming an earlier arbitration agreement after a sexual harassment or assault dispute has arisen changes how the federal exception applies hasn't been decided. [S13]

Incorporation by reference

What it means. Language making an earlier arbitration agreement part of the severance agreement ("The Arbitration Agreement is incorporated by reference").

What it can mean for you. Incorporation works only if the reference is clear and unequivocal, is called to your attention and agreed to, and the terms being incorporated are known or easily available. A vague reference such as "all prior agreements remain in effect" that doesn't identify the document may not be enough. A specific, identified, attached agreement may be. [S39]

"Entire agreement" clauses that replace earlier agreements

What it means. A clause saying the severance agreement is the complete agreement and replaces all prior agreements.

What it can mean for you. If the severance agreement replaces earlier agreements and doesn't preserve the arbitration agreement, a court may find the earlier arbitration agreement was superseded. The severance agreement's own terms then control, including any arbitration terms it has, or doesn't have. [S10] This doesn't happen automatically in every case. It depends on the exact wording, including any list of agreements that survive.

Delegation clauses

What it means. A clause saying the arbitrator, not a court, decides "gateway" questions such as whether the arbitration agreement is valid or covers the dispute. [S17]

What it can mean for you. If the delegation is clear, a court will generally send enforceability questions to the arbitrator unless the challenge is aimed specifically at the delegation clause itself. [S17] That makes a new delegation clause in a severance agreement significant. Under the federal sexual harassment and assault law, a court decides whether that law applies even if an agreement tries to delegate the question. [S13]

Costs, provider, and forum

What the law says. In mandatory employment arbitration of statutory claims, the employer must generally bear the costs unique to arbitration; a missing cost term is read in rather than defeating the agreement. [S12] The arbitrator must be neutral, and one-sided selection methods can support an unfairness challenge. [S12]

California also has rules for when an employer doesn't pay required arbitration fees on time. The employee may be able to take the case back to court, but generally only if the nonpayment was willful, grossly negligent, or fraudulent, not an innocent mistake. Even when late payment is excused, the employer may still owe the employee's resulting fees and costs. [S18] Specific provider rules (such as AAA or JAMS employment rules) depend on the agreement.

Look closely at: who chooses the arbitrator and provider; who pays; where hearings occur; and any fee-shifting terms.

Statutory exceptions

Sexual harassment and sexual assault. Federal law lets a person alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault choose not to be bound by an arbitration agreement made before the dispute arose, and a court decides whether the law applies. [S13] An agreement made after the dispute arose isn't covered. A dispute generally arises when an employee registers disagreement, such as through an internal or external complaint, and the employer opposes it, including by failing to act. It doesn't arise just because the conduct happened. [S13]

That timing matters in a severance agreement. If you complained before receiving the offer, a new arbitration clause in the severance agreement may count as an agreement made after the dispute arose, and may not be covered by the federal exception. If no dispute existed when you signed, the clause would still be covered. [S13]

Other limits. Arbitration can't block your right to file charges with or report to government agencies. [S6]

How arbitration differs from court

FeatureIn arbitrationSource
Group claimsClass and collective waivers in employment arbitration are generally enforceable.[S19]
DiscoveryMust be more than minimal; limits are judged by their terms when the agreement was made, and a clause allowing the arbitrator to order more discovery can cure an otherwise tight limit.[S12][S20]
ConfidentialityA broad confidentiality clause that keeps an employee from gathering evidence or showing a pattern has been held unconscionable without a legitimate business justification.[S21]
Review of the decisionCourts can vacate awards only on narrow statutory grounds.[S22]
Appeals on whether to arbitrateAn employer's appeal of an order denying arbitration no longer automatically pauses the court case.[S22]

Arbitration does not always disadvantage employees. Speed, cost rules, and privacy can sometimes favor them. How arbitration affects accepting, negotiating, or rejecting an offer is covered in the decision guide.

Have a Severance Agreement with Arbitration Language?

Bryant Workers Law reviews the whole agreement — including any arbitration agreement you signed during employment and any new arbitration terms in the severance agreement. If we accept your agreement for review, you will receive a short written assessment of the agreement and your options.

Learn how the free review works

Confidentiality and speech

Confidentiality

What it means. A promise not to disclose the agreement's terms, and sometimes information about the company or the events leading to your departure.

Why employers include it. To avoid precedent with other employees and keep business information private.

Legal limits.

  • A separation agreement cannot restrict your right to disclose information about unlawful acts in the workplace, such as harassment or discrimination or other conduct you have reason to believe is unlawful. Restrictive provisions must include substantially this carve-out: "Nothing in this agreement prevents you from discussing or disclosing information about unlawful acts in the workplace, such as harassment or discrimination or any other conduct that you have reason to believe is unlawful." A provision that violates the rule is unenforceable. [S23]
  • The amount of the severance may be kept confidential. [S23]
  • In settlements of filed claims of sexual assault, sexual harassment, or workplace harassment, discrimination, failure to prevent, or retaliation, provisions restricting disclosure of factual information are void; the amount may be confidential, and your identity may be protected at your request. [S24]
  • Confidentiality cannot prevent communicating with the SEC about possible securities violations. [S25]
  • California law protects employees' right to disclose their wages and information about working conditions. How those protections apply to a particular separation agreement depends on the clause. [S32]
  • For many non-supervisory employees, federal labor law may also limit broad confidentiality clauses in severance agreements that discourage protected activity. [S26]
  • An overbroad confidentiality clause that effectively bars you from working in your field can be treated as an unlawful restraint. [S27]

Look closely at: whether the required carve-out is present; whether the clause reaches the facts of what happened or only the amount; and whether it would stop you from discussing pay or working conditions.

Nondisparagement

What it means. A promise not to say negative things about the employer, and sometimes its people and affiliates.

Why employers include it. Reputation and morale.

What it can mean for you. Broad wording can reach truthful statements, reviews, and social-media posts.

Legal limits. The same California carve-out for information about unlawful acts applies to nondisparagement clauses. [S23] For many non-supervisory employees, federal labor law may also limit broad nondisparagement clauses. [S26]

Look closely at: whether the obligation runs only one way (you can ask whether the employer will instruct named managers not to disparage you); its duration; and whether a breach triggers repayment.

Protected disclosures

Whatever the agreement says, you generally keep the right to report suspected violations of law to government and law-enforcement agencies and to cooperate with their investigations. [S6][S25] Agreements often include a "protected rights" paragraph saying so; its absence doesn't take those rights away, but it can signal other drafting problems worth reviewing. [S23]

Restrictive covenants

Noncompetition

What the law says. California voids noncompete agreements in employment, however narrowly tailored. It is unlawful to include one in an employment contract or require one, and an attempt to enforce one is unlawful regardless of where or when it was signed. An employee may sue for an injunction or damages, with attorney's fees and costs to a prevailing employee. [S28]

Look closely at: clauses that don't say "noncompete" but have the same effect, such as a long "garden leave" tied to forfeiture, or confidentiality so broad you couldn't work in your field. [S27]

Nonsolicitation

What it means. Promises not to solicit the employer's customers or recruit its employees after you leave.

What the law says. A California appellate court has held that a clause barring a former employee from recruiting former coworkers is a void restraint under the state's law against restraints on trade. [S29] Contractual clauses barring a former employee from soliciting former customers are generally unenforceable as restraints, though using actual trade secrets to identify or solicit customers can still be stopped. [S29][S30] A 2026 appellate decision about an employee's duty of loyalty while still employed did not change these rules. [S29]

Trade secrets and confidential information

What the law says. A properly drawn confidentiality agreement that preserves your right to compete is enforceable, and trade-secret protection survives California's restrictions on restraints. [S27][S30] Federal law grants immunity for confidential disclosure of trade secrets to government officials or a lawyer solely to report a suspected violation, and agreements governing confidential information should give notice of that immunity. [S30]

Intellectual property and inventions

What the law says. An invention-assignment clause cannot reach inventions you developed entirely on your own time without the employer's equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secrets, unless the invention relates to the employer's business or research or results from your work. The employer must give written notice of this limit. [S31]

Look closely at: whether the severance agreement reaffirms an earlier invention or confidentiality agreement, and whether you have side projects.

Obligations after you leave

Cooperation

What it means. A promise to help the employer with future investigations or litigation.

What it can mean for you. It can mean time, travel, and involvement in disputes long after you leave.

Look closely at: whether the clause is limited to truthful cooperation; whether it preserves your right to cooperate with government agencies [S6]; whether there are limits on time; whether you'll be paid for your time and reimbursed for expenses; whether receiving severance payments depends on cooperation; and whether anyone other than a court or agency would decide whether your testimony was truthful.

No-rehire

What it means. A promise not to seek or accept future employment with the employer or its affiliates.

What the law says. California bars no-rehire provisions in agreements settling an employment dispute with an employee who had already filed a claim against the employer in court, with an agency, in arbitration, or through the employer's internal complaint process. The rule has narrow exceptions, including where the employer documented a good-faith finding of sexual harassment, sexual assault, or criminal conduct before the claim was filed. [S33] An ordinary severance agreement offered when no claim had been filed is outside this rule. [S33]

Look closely at: whether you had made a complaint or filed a claim before the agreement was offered, and how broadly the clause reaches (affiliates, future owners).

References

What it means. A clause about what the employer will say to prospective employers, often limited to dates and title, or routed through HR.

What the law says. Knowingly false statements to prevent someone from getting hired are prohibited, with treble damages available; truthful references made without malice are privileged. [S34]

Look closely at: who gives references and what they'll say; a negotiated neutral reference is common.

Money terms

Payment terms

What it means. When and how severance is paid: lump sum or installments, and what must happen first (signing, the revocation period ending, returning property).

What the law says. Ordinary severance is taxable wages subject to withholding. [S35] Deferred-compensation rules can limit payment timing, including a six-month delay for certain executives of public companies; failures can trigger significant tax consequences. [S35]

Look closely at: the payment date relative to revocation periods; installment conditions; COBRA subsidy mechanics; and whether amounts you're already owed are being counted as severance. [S4]

Repayment and clawback

What it means. A requirement to return severance, or pay a set amount, if you breach the agreement.

What it can mean for you. A real financial risk if a confidentiality or nondisparagement clause is broad or vague.

Legal limits.

  • An agreement may not penalize you for challenging a federal age-discrimination waiver. [S9]
  • Under California law, an amount fixed in advance for a breach (liquidated damages) is valid unless it was unreasonable when the agreement was made. A clause requiring repayment of everything, or reviving all the released claims, for any breach, including a minor one, may be an unenforceable penalty because it isn't tied to the harm a breach would likely cause. [S37]
  • Whether a particular clause crosses that line depends on how it is written and the circumstances. [S37]

Look closely at: what triggers repayment; whether it's the full amount or proportionate; whether a breach must be material; and who decides whether a breach occurred.

Attorney-fee provisions

What it means. A clause awarding attorney's fees to the winner of a dispute about the agreement.

What the law says.

  • Contract fee clauses. Under California law, a clause giving fees to one side in a dispute over the contract is treated as mutual: whoever prevails on the contract can recover fees, and a waiver of that right is void. [S36]
  • Statutory fee rules are separate. Employment statutes have their own fee rules. Under FEHA, for example, an employer that wins generally can recover its fees from the employee only if the claim was frivolous, and several wage statutes allow a successful employee to recover fees. [S36]
  • An agreement can't use fee-shifting to penalize a challenge to a federal age waiver. [S9]

What it can mean for you. A fee clause can make a dispute about the agreement more costly for whichever side loses. How a contract fee clause interacts with statutory fee rights for claims that aren't released depends on the claim and the clause.

The fine print

Severability

What it means. If part of the agreement is unenforceable, the rest survives.

What it can mean for you. Whether an unlawful confidentiality, nondisparagement, or arbitration provision is cut out or undermines the whole agreement depends on the severability clause and how far the problem runs through the agreement. [S21]

Integration ("entire agreement")

What it means. The written agreement replaces prior discussions and, often, prior agreements, except those it lists as surviving.

What it can mean for you. Check which earlier agreements survive: arbitration, confidentiality, invention assignment, equity plans, and commission plans. A clause that replaces all earlier agreements can end some of them, including an earlier arbitration agreement, if they aren't preserved. [S10] Promises made in conversation that aren't in the document may not be enforceable.

Governing law and venue

What it means. Which state's law applies and where disputes are heard.

What the law says. California makes void restraints on employment unenforceable regardless of where or when the contract was signed. [S28] Other questions about out-of-state law and forum clauses depend on the clause and your circumstances.

Dispute resolution

What it means. How disputes about the agreement itself are handled: court, arbitration, or mediation first. See Arbitration above.

Revocation and effective date

What it means. When the agreement becomes binding, and whether you can change your mind.

What the law says.

  • For a federal age waiver, you have 7 days after signing to revoke, the agreement isn't effective during that time, and the period cannot be shortened. [S8]
  • Otherwise, an agreement is generally binding when signed unless it provides a revocation period.
  • Undoing a signed California agreement later requires legal grounds, such as fraud, duress, mistake, undue influence, or failure of what was promised. [S1][S38] The person undoing it generally must act promptly after discovering the facts, give notice, and return or offer to return what they received, although a delay that didn't prejudice the other side won't by itself defeat the claim. [S38]
  • That return requirement is the opposite of the rule for a defective federal age waiver, where you don't have to give the money back before challenging it. [S9]

Common questions

What claims am I giving up if I sign?

Typically all claims that existed when you signed and fall within the release's terms, including discrimination and harassment claims under broad "employment laws" language. Some rights can't be released. [S1][S3]

Are there claims I can't give up?

Yes. Wages due and unpaid (unless paid), reimbursement of necessary work expenses, future claims, and the right to file charges with or report to government agencies. Representative PAGA claims generally can't be waived privately either, though that area is changing. [S3][S4][S5][S6][S7]

Can I release discrimination and harassment claims?

Yes. Claims that already exist can be released in a negotiated severance agreement, but the agreement can't stop you from reporting to agencies or disclosing information about unlawful acts in the workplace. [S1][S23]

Can I still report discrimination after I sign?

Yes. A severance agreement can't bar you from reporting to or cooperating with government agencies. [S6][S23]

Can the agreement stop me from talking about harassment I experienced?

Not about unlawful acts in the workplace. California requires a carve-out preserving that right in confidentiality and nondisparagement clauses in separation agreements. [S23]

Can they keep the severance amount confidential?

Yes. Confidentiality of the amount paid is permitted. [S23][S24]

I signed an arbitration agreement when I was hired. Am I stuck with it?

Often, but not always. It has to be a validly formed agreement, its terms must be fair, statutory exceptions may apply, and the employer can lose the right to arbitrate through its own litigation conduct. [S11][S12][S13][S14]

Does signing a severance agreement cancel my old arbitration agreement?

Not automatically. If the severance agreement says it replaces all earlier agreements and doesn't preserve the arbitration agreement, it may end it. If it reaffirms or clearly incorporates the old agreement, it may keep it in force, or strengthen it. It depends on the exact wording. [S10][S16][S39]

Who pays for arbitration?

In mandatory employment arbitration of statutory claims, the employer generally must pay the costs unique to arbitration. [S12]

If the employer changes the offer, does my time to consider it reset?

For a federal age waiver, a material change to the final offer restarts the 21- or 45-day period; minor changes don't, and the parties can agree otherwise. [S8]

Can I revoke after signing?

If the agreement waives federal age claims, yes, within 7 days. Otherwise, it depends on the agreement and on legal grounds such as fraud or duress, and undoing it usually means returning what you received. [S8][S38]

Does a no-rehire clause hold up?

California bars no-rehire provisions in agreements settling an employment dispute with an employee who had already filed a claim, with narrow exceptions. An ordinary severance agreement offered when no claim had been filed isn't covered by that rule. [S33]

Can the agreement make me repay the severance if I break a rule?

It can include repayment terms, but California law limits penalties. A clause requiring repayment of everything for any breach may be unenforceable; one reasonably tied to the likely harm may be valid. [S37]

Is a one-sided attorney-fee clause enforceable?

In a dispute over the contract, California treats a one-sided fee clause as mutual, so either side that prevails can recover fees. Statutory fee rules for employment claims are separate. [S36]

Sources & References

  1. [S1]Skrbina v. Fleming Companies (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1353, 1366–1368Skrbina v. Fleming Companies (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1353, 1366–1368
  2. [S2]Cal. Civ. Code § 1542Cal. Civ. Code § 1542
  3. [S3]Cal. Lab. Code § 2804; Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937Cal. Lab. Code § 2804Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937
  4. [S4]Cal. Lab. Code § 206.5Cal. Lab. Code § 206.5
  5. [S5]29 C.F.R. § 825.220; 29 U.S.C. § 626(f)(1)(C)29 C.F.R. § 825.22029 U.S.C. § 626
  6. [S6]Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5
  7. [S7]Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 596 U.S. 639Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 596 U.S. 639
  8. [S8]29 U.S.C. § 626(f); 29 C.F.R. § 1625.2229 U.S.C. § 62629 C.F.R. § 1625.22
  9. [S9]Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc. (1998) 522 U.S. 422; 29 C.F.R. § 1625.23Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc. (1998) 522 U.S. 42229 C.F.R. § 1625.23
  10. [S10]Grey v. American Management Services (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 803, 807–810Grey v. American Management Services (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 803, 807–810
  11. [S11]Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 836, 842–846; Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.7, 1633.9Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 836, 842–846Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.7Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.9
  12. [S12]Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83
  13. [S13]9 U.S.C. §§ 401, 402; Combs v. Netflix, Inc. (9th Cir. 2026) 180 F.4th 1201, 1205–1206; Kader v. Southern California Medical Center, Inc. (2024) 99 Cal.App.5th 214, 217–218, 2249 U.S.C. § 4019 U.S.C. § 402Combs v. Netflix, Inc. (9th Cir. 2026) 180 F.4th 1201, 1205–1206Kader v. Southern California Medical Center, Inc. (2024) 99 Cal.App.5th 214, 217–218, 224
  14. [S14]Quach v. California Commerce Club, Inc. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 562Quach v. California Commerce Club, Inc. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 562
  15. [S15]Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta (9th Cir. 2023) 62 F.4th 473; Cal. Lab. Code § 432.6Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta (9th Cir. 2023) 62 F.4th 473Cal. Lab. Code § 432.6
  16. [S16]Coughenour v. Del Taco, LLC (2020) 57 Cal.App.5th 740, 749Coughenour v. Del Taco, LLC (2020) 57 Cal.App.5th 740, 749
  17. [S17]Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson (2010) 561 U.S. 63, 68–72Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson (2010) 561 U.S. 63, 68–72
  18. [S18]Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1281.97–1281.99; Hohenshelt v. Superior Court (2025) 18 Cal.5th 310, 323; Wilson v. TAP Worldwide, LLC (2025) 114 Cal.App.5th 1077Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281.97Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281.98Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281.99Hohenshelt v. Superior Court (2025) 18 Cal.5th 310, 323Wilson v. TAP Worldwide, LLC (2025) 114 Cal.App.5th 1077
  19. [S19]Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2018) 584 U.S. 497Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2018) 584 U.S. 497
  20. [S20]Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 478Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 478
  21. [S21]Hasty v. American Automobile Assn. (2023) 98 Cal.App.5th 1041Hasty v. American Automobile Assn. (2023) 98 Cal.App.5th 1041
  22. [S22]Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1286.2, 1294Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1286.2Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1294
  23. [S23]Cal. Gov. Code § 12964.5Cal. Gov. Code § 12964.5
  24. [S24]Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1001Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1001
  25. [S25]17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-1717 C.F.R. § 240.21F-17
  26. [S26]McLaren Macomb (2023) 372 NLRB No. 58McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (Feb. 21, 2023), Case 07-CA-263041 — NLRB decision summary
  27. [S27]Brown v. TGS Management Co., LLC (2020) 57 Cal.App.5th 303Brown v. TGS Management Co., LLC (2020) 57 Cal.App.5th 303
  28. [S28]Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 16600, 16600.1, 16600.5Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.1Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16600.5
  29. [S29]AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 923, 939–940; Guild Mortgage Co. LLC v. CrossCountry Mortgage LLC (2026) 120 Cal.App.5th 885, 892–894AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 923, 939–940Guild Mortgage Co. LLC v. CrossCountry Mortgage LLC (2026) 120 Cal.App.5th 885, 892–894
  30. [S30]18 U.S.C. § 1833(b); Cal. Civ. Code § 3426 et seq.18 U.S.C. § 1833Cal. Civ. Code § 3426
  31. [S31]Cal. Lab. Code §§ 2870, 2872Cal. Lab. Code § 2870Cal. Lab. Code § 2872
  32. [S32]Cal. Lab. Code §§ 232, 232.5Cal. Lab. Code § 232Cal. Lab. Code § 232.5
  33. [S33]Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1002.5Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1002.5
  34. [S34]Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1050, 1054; Cal. Civ. Code § 47(c)Cal. Lab. Code § 1050Cal. Lab. Code § 1054Cal. Civ. Code § 47
  35. [S35]United States v. Quality Stores, Inc. (2014) 572 U.S. 141; 26 U.S.C. §§ 3402, 409AUnited States v. Quality Stores, Inc. (2014) 572 U.S. 14126 U.S.C. § 340226 U.S.C. § 409A
  36. [S36]Cal. Civ. Code § 1717; Cal. Gov. Code § 12965; Cal. Lab. Code §§ 218.5, 1194Cal. Civ. Code § 1717Cal. Gov. Code § 12965Cal. Lab. Code § 218.5Cal. Lab. Code § 1194
  37. [S37]Cal. Civ. Code § 1671; Purcell v. Schweitzer (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 969, 974–976Cal. Civ. Code § 1671Purcell v. Schweitzer (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 969, 974–976
  38. [S38]Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1689, 1691, 1693Cal. Civ. Code § 1689Cal. Civ. Code § 1691Cal. Civ. Code § 1693
  39. [S39]Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 632, 641–645Chan v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 632, 641–645
Shelley Bryant, California Employment Attorney

About the Author

Shelley Bryant

California Employment Attorney

Shelley Bryant is a California employment attorney who represents employees only. Mr. Bryant has personally filed and litigated employment lawsuits in 19 California counties. He earned his law degree from the University of California, Davis School of Law.

About Shelley Bryant